From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chicago, R. I. G. Ry. v. Knox

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
May 11, 1911
138 S.W. 224 (Tex. Civ. App. 1911)

Opinion

May 11, 1911.

Appeal from District Court, Jack County; J. W. Patterson, Judge.

Action by S.W. Knox against the Chicago, Rock Island Gulf Railway Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff against the St. Louis Santa Fé Railway Company, it appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Andrews, Ball Streetman, Chapman Lockett, and Stark Cox, for appellant.

Sporer McClure, for appellee.


The suit is for damages to a shipment of cattle from Jacksboro to St. Louis, due to alleged negligent delay and handling over the lines of three defendants. The verdict was in favor of appellee against the St. Louis San Francisco Railway Company, and in favor of the other two companies. A special demurrer was sustained to paragraph 3 of appellants' answer. This was reversible error. See case of Railway Co. v. Rich, 138 S.W. 223, this day decided by this court.

The court's charge assumes that the acts stated and on which negligence is predicated constituted negligence as a matter of law. It reads: "And if you believe by any of such acts of negligence of said defendant the plaintiff's cattle were injured and depreciated in value, and plaintiff was damaged, you will find for the plaintiff against the defendant St. Louis San Francisco Railway Company for such damages." This was reversible error.

The judgment as to this appellant was ordered reversed and the cause remanded. The judgment in favor of the Chicago, Rock Island Gulf Railway Company and the Chicago, Rock Island Pacific Railway Company, not being appealed from, will remain undisturbed.


Summaries of

Chicago, R. I. G. Ry. v. Knox

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
May 11, 1911
138 S.W. 224 (Tex. Civ. App. 1911)
Case details for

Chicago, R. I. G. Ry. v. Knox

Case Details

Full title:CHICAGO, R. I. G. RY. CO. et al. v. KNOX

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana

Date published: May 11, 1911

Citations

138 S.W. 224 (Tex. Civ. App. 1911)

Citing Cases

C.C.C. St. L. Ry. Co. v. Stormont

This rule was recognized by our Supreme Court before the passage of said Act. See Pitt., etc., Ry. Co. v.…