From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cherry, Bekaert Holland v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 6, 1982
286 S.E.2d 287 (Ga. 1982)

Summary

In Holland v. Barnes, 53 Ala. 83, 25 Am. Rep. 595, this court had before it that exact question, and held that because five other witnesses testified as to such character it did not cure the error.

Summary of this case from Carter v. State

Opinion

37898.

DECIDED JANUARY 6, 1982.

Injunction. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Jenrette.

Arnall, Golden Gregory, H. Fred Gober, Simon A. Miller, for appellants.

Ware, Parker, Johnson, Cook Dunlevie, G. William Long III, for appellees.


The judgment of the trial court is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59.

All the Justices concur, except Marshall, J., who dissents and Weltner, J., not participating.

DECIDED JANUARY 6, 1982.


Summaries of

Cherry, Bekaert Holland v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 6, 1982
286 S.E.2d 287 (Ga. 1982)

In Holland v. Barnes, 53 Ala. 83, 25 Am. Rep. 595, this court had before it that exact question, and held that because five other witnesses testified as to such character it did not cure the error.

Summary of this case from Carter v. State
Case details for

Cherry, Bekaert Holland v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:CHERRY, BEKAERT HOLLAND v. BARNES et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 6, 1982

Citations

286 S.E.2d 287 (Ga. 1982)
248 Ga. 716

Citing Cases

Continental Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

Fabian v. Dykes, 210 Ga. App. 703 ( 436 S.E.2d 819) (1993); Wright v. Millines, 204 Ga. App. 111 ( 418 S.E.2d…

McRee v. Russell

Hicks v. N.W. Mut. L. I. Co., 166 Iowa 532, 147 N.W. 883, L.R.A.1915A, 872; Nutter v. Des Moines L. I. Co.,…