From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chatha v. Prairie View A&M Univ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Aug 31, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-3234 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-3234

08-31-2016

DILJIT K CHATHA, Plaintiff, v. PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Instrument No. 35) of United States Magistrate Judge Mary Milloy signed on August 10, 2016, regarding Instrument No. 28. The Court finds as of August 31, 2016, no objections were filed by either party pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and General Order 80-5, S.D. Texas. Failure to file objections within 10 days after being served with a copy has barred the parties from attacking on appeal the Magistrate's factual findings.

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Milloy's Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby adopted by this Court.

The Clerk of the Court shall provide a true copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

SIGNED on this the 31st day of August, 2016, at Houston, Texas.

/s/ _________

VANESSA D. GILMORE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chatha v. Prairie View A&M Univ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Aug 31, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-3234 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2016)
Case details for

Chatha v. Prairie View A&M Univ.

Case Details

Full title:DILJIT K CHATHA, Plaintiff, v. PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Aug 31, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-3234 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2016)

Citing Cases

Niemann v. Univ. of N. Tex.

The Court is persuaded that Dr. Cox, Dr. Eve, and Dr. Goven were not similarly situated to Dr. Niemann. "It…