From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chase v. Raymond & Rosa Parks Institute for Self-Dev.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 29, 2011
490 Mich. 975 (Mich. 2011)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 143419 143420 143421 143422.COA Nos. 293897 293899 296294 296295.

2011-12-29

John M. CHASE, Jr. and Melvin D. Jefferson as Personal Representatives for the Estate of Rosa Louise Parks, Petitioners–Appellees, v. RAYMOND AND ROSA PARKS INSTITUTE FOR SELF–DEVELOPMENT and Elaine Steele, Respondents–Appellants,andSylvester James McCauley, Deborah Ann Ross, Asheber Machiria, Robert Duane McCauley, Mary Yvonne Trusei, Rosalind Elaine Bridgeforth, Rhea Darcelle McCauley, Susan Diane McCauley, Shirley McCauley Jenkins, Sheila Gaye Keys, Richard McCauley, William McCauley, Cheryl Marguarite McCauley, Sylvester McCauley III, Lonnie McCauley, and Urana McCauley, Respondents–Appellees.


Prior report: Mich.App., 2011 WL 1485403.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The reference by counsel for the Raymond and Rosa Parks Institute for Self–Development and Elaine Steele, during the course of oral argument in the Court of Appeals, to the respective percentages of the fees charged by the court-appointed fiduciaries for which he believed the parties to the appeal would be liable, without referring to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, did not constitute a breach of the Settlement Agreement's confidentiality provision, and the finding below that it did is clearly erroneous. The Settlement Agreement contains no provision allocating litigation costs between the parties.

We REMAND this case to the Wayne County Probate Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. We FURTHER INSTRUCT the court to implement Paragraph 1 of the Settlement Agreement within thirty days of the date of this order, or report to this Court within that time why it does not deem it “practicable” to do so.

The motion to dismiss is DENIED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Chase v. Raymond & Rosa Parks Institute for Self-Dev.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 29, 2011
490 Mich. 975 (Mich. 2011)
Case details for

Chase v. Raymond & Rosa Parks Institute for Self-Dev.

Case Details

Full title:John M. CHASE, Jr. and Melvin D. Jefferson as Personal Representatives for…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Dec 29, 2011

Citations

490 Mich. 975 (Mich. 2011)
806 N.W.2d 528

Citing Cases

Rosa & Raymond Parks Inst. for Self-Dev. v. Chase (In re Rosa Louise Parks Trust)

Although this Court affirmed the probate court's rulings, our Supreme Court, in lieu of granting the…

Steele v. McCauley

Id. However, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals judgment in lieu of granting the…