From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chase v. Family Court Judge Czajka

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 8, 2005
No. 04 Civ. 8228 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2005)

Opinion

No. 04 Civ. 8228 (LAK).

June 8, 2005


ORDER


On March 23, 2005, Chief Magistrate Judge Peck rendered a report and recommendation recommending that the complaint in this action be dismissed in its entirety under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. One week later, the Supreme Court sharply limited the scope of that doctrine in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 125 S.Ct. 1517 (2005). The Court therefore remanded the motion to Judge Peck for reconsideration in light of Exxon Mobil. Judge Peck now has rendered a new report and recommendation, again recommending dismissal or, alternatively, transfer to the Northern District of New York on the ground of improper venue. Plaintiff has objected to dismissal but consents to transfer of the action to the Northern District.

As Judge Peck plainly is correct that venue is improper in this district, and given plaintiff's consent to transfer, this action is hereby transferred to the Northern District of New York. This ruling is without prejudice to the defendants' motion to dismiss and to plaintiff's objections to Judge Peck's reports and recommendations.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chase v. Family Court Judge Czajka

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 8, 2005
No. 04 Civ. 8228 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2005)
Case details for

Chase v. Family Court Judge Czajka

Case Details

Full title:JOHN T. CHASE, Plaintiff, v. FAMILY COURT JUDGE PAUL CZAJKA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 8, 2005

Citations

No. 04 Civ. 8228 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2005)

Citing Cases

In re Chase

In the second Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Debtor's complaint be…