Opinion
October 30, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nahman, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Upon our review of the record, we conclude that no basis exists for disturbing the hearing court's determination that the foreclosure sale was conducted properly, and that the purchase price was not so inadequate as to warrant vacatur of the sale (see, RPAPL 231; Buttermark Plumbing Heating Corp. v Sagarese, 119 A.D.2d 540; Hammerman v Ferguson, 50 A.D.2d 853). Spatt, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.