From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charlton v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-56-O (N.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-56-O

12-14-2011

MARY CHARLTON and JEFFREY CHARLTON, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case to grant Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion for Attorneys' Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (ECF No. 33). No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Michael J. Astrue pay Plaintiff's Attorney attorneys' fees of $10,000.

_________________

Reed O'Connr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Charlton v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-56-O (N.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Charlton v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MARY CHARLTON and JEFFREY CHARLTON, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 14, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-56-O (N.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2011)

Citing Cases

Rosales v. Berryhill

Under the relevant factors acknowledged by the Fifth Circuit, first, courts have recognized that there is a…

Malmstead v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Under the relevant factors identified by the Fifth Circuit, first, courts have recognized that there is a…