From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charlotte Prime, LLC v. AT&T Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Oct 16, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-cv-594-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-cv-594-FDW-DSC

10-16-2012

CHARLOTTE PRIME, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AT&T CORP., and THE COMTRAN GROUP, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant The Comtran Group, Inc.'s "Motion to Transfer Venue" (document #7) and "Brief in Support ..." (document #8), both filed September 19, 2012. No brief in opposition has been filed and the time for filing a responsive brief has expired.

Comtran seeks transfer of this matter to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The Supreme Court has held that this provision is:

28 U.S.C. §1404(a) provides: "[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought."

intended to place discretion in the district court to adjudicate motions for transfer according to an individualized, case-by-case consideration of convenience and fairness. A motion to transfer under §1404(a) thus calls on the district court to weigh in the balance a number of case-specific factors.
Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988) (quotations and citations omitted). See also Brock v. Entre Computer Centers, Inc., 933 F.2d 1253, 1258 (4th Cir. 1991) (enumerating factors to consider); AC Controls Co v. Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc., 284 F.Supp. 2d 357, 362-63 (W.D.N.C. 2003) (considering factors and transferring venue); Rice v. BellSouth Advertising & Pub. Corp., 240 F.Supp.2d 526, 529 (W.D.N.C.2002) ("[a] court should analyze each of these factors both quantitatively and qualitatively"); D.P. Riggins & Associates, Inc. v. American Board Companies, Inc., 796 F.Supp. 205, 211-12 (W.D.N.C. 1992).

This matter arises entirely out of activities that occurred in Savannah, Georgia. The only connection to North Carolina is the fact that Plaintiff has its principal place of business here. The transfer factors set forth in Brock, 933 F.2d at 1258, weigh heavily in favor of transferring this case to the Southern District of Georgia.

For these reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant The Comtran Group, Inc.'s "Motion to Transfer Venue" (document #7) is GRANTED and this matter shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.

2. The Clerk is directed to send the instant file, including this Order, to the Clerk of Court for the Southern District of Georgia.

3. The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order to counsel of record; and to the Honorable Frank D. Whitney.

SO ORDERED.

______________

David S. Cayer

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Charlotte Prime, LLC v. AT&T Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Oct 16, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-cv-594-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Charlotte Prime, LLC v. AT&T Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE PRIME, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AT&T CORP., and THE COMTRAN GROUP…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 16, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-cv-594-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2012)