From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. U.S. Justice Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
May 8, 2019
2:19-cv-00036-JM-JTR (E.D. Ark. May. 8, 2019)

Opinion

2:19-cv-00036-JM-JTR

05-08-2019

WOODROW CHAPMAN PLAINTIFF v. UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT; DEWAYNE HENDRIX, Warden, FCI-Forrest City RESPONDENTS


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order entered separately today, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief sought is denied, and the case is closed.

Dated this 8th day of March 2019.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chapman v. U.S. Justice Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
May 8, 2019
2:19-cv-00036-JM-JTR (E.D. Ark. May. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Chapman v. U.S. Justice Dep't

Case Details

Full title:WOODROW CHAPMAN PLAINTIFF v. UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT; DEWAYNE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 8, 2019

Citations

2:19-cv-00036-JM-JTR (E.D. Ark. May. 8, 2019)

Citing Cases

United States v. Laurita

Alternatively, the court could find the petition premature for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.…

Meadows v. Yates

United States District Judge James M. Moody, Jr., had an occasion to consider the exhaustion requirement in…