Summary
holding the ability to do dishes, fold laundry, perform mending, and pick up around the house were not inconsistent with a physical disability
Summary of this case from Rose v. AstrueOpinion
Civil Action No.: 07-2868-TLW-TER.
January 29, 2010
ORDER
Plaintiff has brought this action to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, denying his claims for disability benefits. This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers, III, to whom this case had previously been assigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(a), (D.S.C.). In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the case be remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action to determine if plaintiff is entitled to benefits from the alleged onset date of November 10, 2002. (Doc. # 19). The Report was filed on January 11, 2010. The defendant filed notice that it would not file objections to the Report. (Doc. # 21).
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to the Report of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. # 19).