From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chao v. Hollingshead

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 28, 2016
141 A.D.3d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

07-28-2016

In the Matter of James CHAO, Petitioner, v. Timothy HOLLINGSHEAD, as Correction Lieutenant at Sullivan Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

James Chao, Fallsburg, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.


James Chao, Fallsburg, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, including reinstatement to his prison job and back pay, “inmates have no constitutional or statutory right to their prior housing or programming status” (Matter of Hamilton v. Bezio, 93 A.D.3d 1049, 1050, 940 N.Y.S.2d 496 [2012] ; see Matter of Folk v. Annucci, 122 A.D.3d 977, 978, 994 N.Y.S.2d 550 [2014] ). Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Hill v. Annucci, 136 A.D.3d 1081, 1082, 23 N.Y.S.3d 916 [2016] ; Matter of Folk v. Annucci, 122 A.D.3d at 978, 994 N.Y.S.2d 550 ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., GARRY, LYNCH, DEVINE and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chao v. Hollingshead

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 28, 2016
141 A.D.3d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Chao v. Hollingshead

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of James CHAO, Petitioner, v. Timothy HOLLINGSHEAD, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 28, 2016

Citations

141 A.D.3d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5699
35 N.Y.S.3d 673

Citing Cases

Ortega v. Lee

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…

Morgan v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…