From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chang v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 28, 1991
170 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 28, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.).


Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile operated by Robert Fernandez when it was involved in an accident. As a result of injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff, she commenced this action against defendant, the owner of the automobile. In support of her motion for summary judgment, defendant relies on her deposition testimony as well as a sworn affidavit in which she avers that the driver, her brother, did not have her permission or consent, express or implied, to use her automobile. Supreme Court denied her motion, giving rise to this appeal. We have previously held that summary judgment is unavailable where, as here, the facts underlying the motion are solely within the knowledge of the moving party. In such case the movant's version should be subjected to cross-examination at trial (Santorio v Diaz, 86 A.D.2d 926). Accordingly, Supreme Court's order is affirmed.

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., Crew III, and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chang v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 28, 1991
170 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Chang v. Fernandez

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE A. CHANG, Respondent, v. JOSEPHINE FERNANDEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 28, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Passaretti v. Aurora Pump Co.

h of warranty or strict products liability upon a party that is outside the manufacturing, selling, or…

Exchange Insurance Company v. Pond

Further, Pond did not have permission to drive any of the insured's vehicles, including the one involved in…