From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chandler v. Motivepower, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 16, 2018
239 So. 3d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2D17–1608

03-16-2018

Joel Edward CHANDLER, Appellant, v. MOTIVEPOWER, INC., Appellee.

Jeffrey A. Rapkin of the Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Rapkin, Port Charlotte, for Appellant. David B. Shelton and Damien A. Orato of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.


Jeffrey A. Rapkin of the Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Rapkin, Port Charlotte, for Appellant.

David B. Shelton and Damien A. Orato of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order granting summary judgment without further comment. However, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the appeal challenging the trial court's reservation of jurisdiction on attorney fees. See, e.g., Card v. Card, 122 So.3d 436, 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (dismissing the portion of the appeal challenging attorney fees because not only was the order ambiguous as to entitlement but it also failed to set an amount of fees thereby rendering that portion of the final judgment nonfinal and nonappealable).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

KELLY, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Chandler v. Motivepower, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 16, 2018
239 So. 3d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Chandler v. Motivepower, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Joel Edward CHANDLER, Appellant, v. MOTIVEPOWER, INC., Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Mar 16, 2018

Citations

239 So. 3d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)