From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chandler v. Hill

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Aug 24, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1081-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1081-MEF WO.

August 24, 2011


ORDER


This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Objection to Courts[sic] Decision (Doc. # 33), which this Court construes as an objection to the May 5, 2011 (Doc. # 25) denying Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel to represent him. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), this Court has reviewed the objection, the Magistrate Judge's Order, and all submissions related to those Orders. This Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's Order is neither clearly erroneous, nor contrary to law. Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff's objection is OVERRULED.


Summaries of

Chandler v. Hill

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Aug 24, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1081-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Chandler v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY CLAYTON CHANDLER, Plaintiff, v. A. J. HILL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1081-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Aug. 24, 2011)

Citing Cases

Daniels v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

"The statute includes all claims, whatever their bases, as long as the claim is 'necessary to a decision by…