From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chandler v. Cannon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-2350 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-2350

11-27-2012

JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, Plaintiff v. MR. KENT CANNON, MS. DANIELLE MINK, Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2012, upon consideration of plaintiff's recently filed Bivens action (Doc. 1), in which he seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2), and upon consideration of the fact that plaintiff has incurred three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), see Ibrahim v. District of Columbia, 208 F.3d 1032 (D.C.Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S.Ct. 2249 (June 11, 2001), and it appearing that he is alleging that he is being denied treatment for his mental health condition, "Erotomania (Delusional state of affection)" (Doc. 1, at 3), and it further appearing that he fails to demonstrate that a threat of danger is real and proximate and, therefore, his claim fails to meet the imminent danger exception, see Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 312 (3d Cir. 2001)(en banc); Lewis v. Sullivan, 279 F.3d 526, 531 (7th Cir. 2002) (finding that the "imminent danger" exception is available "for genuine emergencies," where "time is pressing" and "a threat . . . is real and proximate"), it is hereby ORDERED that:

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Bivens stands for the proposition that "a citizen suffering a compensable injury to a constitutionally protected interest could invoke the general federal-question jurisdiction of the district courts to obtain an award of monetary damages against the responsible federal official." Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 504 (1978).

Plaintiff alleges that his condition causes him to write love letters and make sexual proposals to female correctional officers and that this behavior causes male correctional officers to react violently. (Doc. 1, at 4.)
--------

1. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED.
2. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to VACATE the administrative order (Doc. 5) and NOTIFY the warden at the United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
5. Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

____________________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Chandler v. Cannon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-2350 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Chandler v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, Plaintiff v. MR. KENT CANNON, MS. DANIELLE MINK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-2350 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Seabloom v. Krier

He thinks real estate only is involved in condemnation. In support are cited Chandler v. Kent, 8 Minn. 467…

State ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court

Art. 1, § 4. 5. The probate court being without authority to determine the issues here involved, it…