Chan Pong v. United States

Full title: CHAN PONG v. UNITED STATES (two cases).

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 16, 1916

230 F. 1021 (9th Cir. 1916)

Opinion

230 F. 1021 (9th Cir. 1916) CHAN PONG v. UNITED STATES (two cases). Nos. 2605, 2606. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 16, 1916

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.

George J. Hatfield, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

John W. Preston, U.S. Atty., and Caspar A. Ornbaum, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal.

Dismissed for noncompliance by plaintiff in error with rules 23 and 24 (150 F. xxxii, xxxiii, 79 C.C.A. xxxii, xxxiii)-- failure of plaintiff in error to print record under rule 23, and to file a printed brief, under rule 24.