From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chambers v. Conard

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Dec 11, 2013
547 F. App'x 807 (8th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-3024

12-11-2013

Roscoe Chambers Plaintiff - Appellant v. Dennis Conard, Sheriff, Scott County Jail; Unknown Glasgow, Scott County Jail; Unknown Walker, Scott County Jail; Sean ONeal, USMS; Unknown Jackson, Scott County Jail; Humes, C/O; Clark, C/O; Kelso, C/O; Jennins, C/O; Broder, Sgt.; Pearce, C/O; Tibbitt, Major; Shedo, C/O; Halter, C/O; Blea, C/O; Lefman, C/O; Bibens, C/O; Bright, C/O; Boyd, Sgt.; Salsberry, Sgt.; Gaudet, Sgt. Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines


[Unpublished]

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Roscoe Chambers appeals the district court's 28 U.S.C. § 1915A preservice dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (standard of review), we conclude that Chambers failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (complaint must state "more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation"; mere conclusory statements are insufficient to support claim). We therefore affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.


Summaries of

Chambers v. Conard

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Dec 11, 2013
547 F. App'x 807 (8th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Chambers v. Conard

Case Details

Full title:Roscoe Chambers Plaintiff - Appellant v. Dennis Conard, Sheriff, Scott…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

547 F. App'x 807 (8th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Chambers v. Edinger

In light of the narrowing of the applicable § 1915(g) standard under Byrd, we have independently confirmed…

Chambers v. Ebbert

The parties do not dispute the fact that Plaintiff had three prior "strikes" under the PLRA - i.e., actions…