From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chakford v. Strum

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B
May 24, 1956
87 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1956)

Opinion

May 2, 1956. Rehearing Denied May 24, 1956.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Grady L. Crawford, J.

L.S. Julian and Shutts, Bowen, Simmons, Prevatt Julian Miami, for appellants.

Jeptha P. Marchant and Joseph A. Perkins, Miami, for appellee.


The record and briefs have been carefully examined. The case was tried by the Circuit Judge upon a waiver of the jury by the parties. His factual findings in favor of the appellee are entitled to the weight of a jury verdict and will not be disturbed unless it is shown that there is a total lack of substantial evidence to support his conclusion. The record reveals adequate support for the findings and conclusion of the trial judge.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed on the authority of the rule announced in MacGregor v. Sachs, Fla. 1952, 57 So.2d 426; Read v. Frizzell, Fla. 1952, 60 So.2d 172; King v. Griner, Fla. 1952, 60 So.2d 177; First Atlantic Nat. Bank v. Cobbett, Fla. 1955, 82 So.2d 870.

Affirmed.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chakford v. Strum

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B
May 24, 1956
87 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1956)
Case details for

Chakford v. Strum

Case Details

Full title:ROSE CHAKFORD AND HENRY CHAKFORD, SR., APPELLANTS, v. SANFORD Z. STRUM…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B

Date published: May 24, 1956

Citations

87 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1956)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Goldsmith

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 620.66(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b)(3); Chakford v. Strum, 87 So.2d…

Strawgate v. Turner

Findings by trial court will not be disturbed unless there is a lack of substantial evidence to support the…