From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaikin v. City of Miami

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Apr 18, 1947
30 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1947)

Opinion

April 18, 1947

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Charles A. Carroll, Judge.

Hoffman Durant, for appellants.

J.W. Watson, Jr., and Franklin Parson, for appellee.


The petitioners sought the issuance of a license to sell intoxicating liquors in a package store, in the City of Miami. They filed a petition for a declaratory decree under the provisions of F.S.A. Sec. 87.01, basing their contention upon the invalidity of Municipal Ordinance No. 2896, which prevented the issuance of a new license for one whose place of business would be located in what was termed a "Combination Residential and Business Zone," within 2500 feet of an established licensee. The Chancellor, in a comprehensive final decree, upheld the validity of the ordinance. The contentions of the petitioners have been decided adversely by this Court in City of Miami v. State ex rel Green, 131 Fla. 864, 180 So. 45; City of Miami v. Kichinko, 156 Fla. 128, 22 So.2d 627; State ex rel Dixie Inn, Inc. v. City of Miami, et al., 156 Fla. 784, 24 So.2d 705.

Affirmed.

THOMAS, C. J., BUFORD, CHAPMAN, ADAMS, and BARNS, JJ., concur.

TERRELL, J., nor participating.


Summaries of

Chaikin v. City of Miami

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Apr 18, 1947
30 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1947)
Case details for

Chaikin v. City of Miami

Case Details

Full title:LEO A. CHAIKIN, CARL WEINKLE and AARON WEINKLE co-partners, doing business…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc

Date published: Apr 18, 1947

Citations

30 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1947)
30 So. 2d 101

Citing Cases

Norwood v. Capps

A municipal ordinance requiring a licensed business for the sale of malt or brewed beverages to be more than…