From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 25, 2009
4 So. 3d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 4D08-908.

March 25, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Robert L. Pegg, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312007CJ000837A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sue-Ellen Kenny, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The issue raised in this juvenile delinquency appeal is identical to the one raised in our recent decision in E.E. v. State, ___ So.3d ___, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D534, 2009 WL 605399 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 11, 2009). As we did there, we reverse the disposition imposed in this case under the authority of E.A.R. v. State, 4 So.3d 614, 2009 WL 217979 (Fla. Jan. 30, 2009), and remand with instructions to hold a new disposition hearing complying with E.A.R. The court is free to require an updated PDR, and all parties should be allowed to present new evidence and argument for the ultimate disposition.

GROSS, C.J. and DAMOORGIAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

C.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 25, 2009
4 So. 3d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

C.H. v. State

Case Details

Full title:C.H., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

Citations

4 So. 3d 794 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

D.R.R. v. State

The trial court may again impose a Level 8 commitment if it is able to make the findings required by E.A.R.…