From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CGU Ins. v. Greatheart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2003
301 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2000-06771

Submitted January 8, 2003.

January 27, 2003.

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the American Agents Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated June 1, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.

Birzon, Quinn Strang, Smithtown, N.Y. (Joseph K. Strang of counsel), for appellant.

Curtis, Vasile, Devine McElhenny, Merrick, N.Y. (Kathryn Fitzgerald of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner made a prima facie showing that the offending vehicle was insured at the time of the accident. The burden thus shifted to the appellant to prove that the vehicle was not insured (see Matter of Globe Indem. v. Lawrence, 210 A.D.2d 334; cf. Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Yeglinski, 79 A.D.2d 1029). The appellant's evidence was insufficient to overcome the petitioner's showing that the offending vehicle was insured on the day of the accident (see Matter of State Farm Ins. Co v. Vanblarcom, 226 A.D.2d 732).

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

CGU Ins. v. Greatheart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2003
301 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

CGU Ins. v. Greatheart

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CGU INS. CO., ETC., petitioner-respondent, v. LAMONT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

In re Govt. Employ. Ins. Co. v. O'Neil

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The appellant AIU Insurance Company (hereinafter AIU) does…

In the Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez

Since Rodriguez did not rebut the petitioner's prima facie case, the Supreme Court properly concluded that…