Cetto v. State

Full title: JENNA CETTO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 24, 2020

288 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-1956

01-24-2020

Jenna CETTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Jenna Cetto appeals the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court after she admitted to violating her probation. We affirm the violation. However, as the State properly concedes, we are compelled to remand because the trial court failed to specify which conditions of probation Cetto violated. See Lowe v. State, 225 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ; Manis v. State, 30 So. 3d 586, 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand to the trial court for entry of a proper order specifying the conditions of probation Cetto violated.

VACATED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.