From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cetnar v. Kinowski

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 2000
94 N.Y.2d 872 (N.Y. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 27, 1999

Decided January 11, 2000


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division where the appeal to the Appellate Division was from an order entered on an appeal from another court (see, N.Y. Const, art VI, § 3[b][7]; CPLR 5602[a]).


Summaries of

Cetnar v. Kinowski

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 2000
94 N.Y.2d 872 (N.Y. 2000)
Case details for

Cetnar v. Kinowski

Case Details

Full title:DALE W. CETNAR, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER J. KINOWSKI et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 11, 2000

Citations

94 N.Y.2d 872 (N.Y. 2000)
705 N.Y.S.2d 2
726 N.E.2d 479

Citing Cases

Rlafehn v. Morrison

Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiff's second cause of action asserting a breach of contract as barred by the…

Macri v. Vandermark

Defendant acknowledged that he had not repaired the leak and that although he was aware of the leak at the…