Summary
holding that a two-level increase for obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 applies “where a defendant engages in obstructive conduct with knowledge that he or she is the subject of an investigation or with the correct belief that an investigation of the defendant is probably underway”
Summary of this case from U.S. v. GilchristOpinion
MAY 14, 2001
No. 00-9228. TIRADO GARCIA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 897.
No. 00-9233. DORET v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 765 A.2d 47.
No. 00-9236. ROSELLO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F.3d 746.
No. 00-9238. MATHIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 213.
No. 00-9239. BARRETT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 231 F.3d 890.
No. 00-9241. BROWN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 F.3d 625.
No. 00-9248. PETRILLO v. MASSACHUSETTS. App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 50 Mass. App. Ct. 104, 735 N.E.2d 395.
No. 00-9250. SILVERS v. NEBRASKA. Sup.Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 260 Neb. 831, 620 N.W.2d 73.
No. 00-9260. WALTERS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-9270. FOSTER v. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Sup.Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-9283. GIBBONS v. MENIFEE, WARDEN. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-9286. NORRIS v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: ___ Ill. App.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___.
No. 00-9287. PRI-HAR v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-9291. BALTAS, AKA DIPINTO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 236 F.3d 27.
No. 00-9294. NAVARETTE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 389.