From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 26, 2001
531 U.S. 1201 (2001)

Summary

holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) does not toll the limitations period to take into account the time in which a defendant could have potentially filed a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, following a state court's denial of post-conviction relief

Summary of this case from Schroeder v. Renico

Opinion

FEBRUARY 26, 2001


00-8182. FELICI v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 667.

00-8186. HADDEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 841.

00-8189. FEASTER v. BESHEARS, WARDEN. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 208.

00-8190. HORTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 842.

00-8195. BURNETTE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1270.

00-8204. CALDERON-LEAL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 F.3d 636.

00-8208. CURLEE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 229 F.3d 1144.

00-8211. MONTAGUE v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below 234 F.3d 1263.

00-8213. BASTIAN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-8217. MORTIMORE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 888.

00-8220. FELICIANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below 228 F.3d 413.

00-8222. ISHAM v. RANDLE, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 226 F.3d 691.

00-8225. FRANCIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-8229. HERRERA v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-8230. HATCHER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 823.

00-8237. GREEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 891.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 26, 2001
531 U.S. 1201 (2001)

holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) does not toll the limitations period to take into account the time in which a defendant could have potentially filed a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, following a state court's denial of post-conviction relief

Summary of this case from Schroeder v. Renico

holding that habeas petition filed thirteen days after the one year statute of limitations expired was barred as untimely

Summary of this case from Neal v. Bock
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 26, 2001

Citations

531 U.S. 1201 (2001)
121 S. Ct. 1211

Citing Cases

Abela v. Martin

A panel of this court heard argument in this case, but it declined to reach the merits. The panel held that…

Swingle v. Money

There is no dispute that Swingle was entitled to the 1-year grace period from April 24, 1996 [the enactment…