From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 13, 2002
535 U.S. 1064 (2002)

Summary

denying certiorari petition concerning the affirmance of the denial of the amended rule 3.850 motion

Summary of this case from Jimenez v. State

Opinion

MAY 13, 2002.


No. 01-8956 MOODY v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 Fed. Appx. 149.

No. 01-8957 MOODY v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 21 Fed. Appx. 220.

No. 01-8959 BARCENAS-ANGELINA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 155.

No. 01-8962 JACKSON v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: ___ Ill. App.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___.

No. 01-8964 JIMENEZ v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 810 So.2d 511.

No. 01-8968 MARCELLO ET UX. v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES. Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 788 A.2d 177.

No. 01-8969 WALKER v. NEW YORK. App. Div. Sup.Ct. N.Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 285 A.D.2d 660, 727 N.Y.S.2d 731.

No. 01-8970 DuBOSE v. KELLY ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 12 Fed. Appx. 428.

No. 01-8971 WEBB v. KILGORE, SHERIFF, LAYFAYETTE COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8982 HAYNES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 F.3d 164.

No. 01-8988 GUMPERT v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 6th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 48 S.W.3d 450.

No. 01-8995 GILCHRIST v. SMITH, SUPERINTENDENT, OGDENSBURG CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 260 F.3d 87.

No. 01-9005 WOOD v. HAGEN. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 21 Fed. Appx. 81.

No. 01-9009 STANSBURY v. McKUNE, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 Fed. Appx. 830.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 13, 2002
535 U.S. 1064 (2002)

denying certiorari petition concerning the affirmance of the denial of the amended rule 3.850 motion

Summary of this case from Jimenez v. State

denying certiorari petition concerning the affirmance of the denial of the amended rule 3.850 motion

Summary of this case from Jimenez v. State

noting that rights under Sixth Amendment to United States Constitution may be forfeited without prior warning

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Means
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 13, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 1064 (2002)

Citing Cases

Young v. McGinnis

The phrase, "clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,"…

Schicchi v. Ercole

The Supreme Court has interpreted the phrase "clearly established Federal law" to mean "the holdings, as…