From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 26, 2001
531 U.S. 1194 (2001)

Summary

concluding equitable tolling "is only available when an inmate diligently pursues his claims and demonstrates that the failure to timely file was caused by extraordinary circumstances beyond his control."

Summary of this case from United States v. Halcrombe

Opinion

FEBRUARY 26, 2001


00-7631. MARSH v. SOARES, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 223 F.3d 1217.

00-7633. LYNCH v. NEW YORK. App. Div., Sup.Ct. N.Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 A.D.2d 806, 708 N.Y.S.2d 541.

00-7634. McKIBBEN v. HEAD, WARDEN. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7638. JENNINGS-JONES v. CHILDREN'S HARBOR, INC. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 723.

00-7641. MACKEY v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 209.

00-7646. MADSEN v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-7647. JOHNSON v. CHOATE ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 F.3d 630.

00-7650. MILLER v. LOUISIANA. Sup.Ct. La. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 776 So.2d 396.

00-7651. PERRY v. BLACKWELL, ADMINISTRATOR, EDNA MAHAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY FOR WOMEN, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7652. JAMES v. HEARVY ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7653. SALINAS MESTIZA v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7655. McCALLUP v. MISSISSIPPI. Sup.Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.

00-7658. ZIEGLER v. MICHIGAN ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1361.

00-7659. METZENBAUM v. MARK GLASSMAN, INC., ET AL. Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 26, 2001
531 U.S. 1194 (2001)

concluding equitable tolling "is only available when an inmate diligently pursues his claims and demonstrates that the failure to timely file was caused by extraordinary circumstances beyond his control."

Summary of this case from United States v. Halcrombe

explaining equitable tolling "is only available when an inmate diligently pursues his claims and demonstrates that the failure to timely file was caused by extraordinary circumstances."

Summary of this case from Sullivan v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.

explaining equitable tolling "is only available when an inmate diligently pursues his claims and demonstrates that the failure to timely file was caused by extraordinary circumstances."

Summary of this case from United States v. Barnes

regarding the tolling of the limitations period of 2244(d) concerning an application for a writ for habeas corpus

Summary of this case from Chance v. Zinke

noting that the extraordinary circumstance must be beyond a petitioner's control

Summary of this case from Loftis v. Chrisman

regarding the tolling of the limitations period of 2244(d) concerning an application for a writ for habeas corpus

Summary of this case from Strich v. U.S.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 26, 2001

Citations

531 U.S. 1194 (2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Denny

" One of these decisions equates the date of "mailing" with the date the objections were signed. See Marsh v.…

United States v. Barnes

The Tenth Circuit has explained that equitable tolling "would be appropriate, for example, when a prisoner is…