Summary
noting that the district court dismissed the plaintiff's qui tam action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the claim was time-barred
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.Opinion
NOVEMBER 26, 2001
No. 01-134 ABBOTT, AKA ROBERSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 5 Fed. Appx. 331.
No. 01-204 KISSIMMEE RIVER VALLEY SPORTSMAN ASSN. v. CITY OF LAKELAND. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F.3d 1324.
No. 01-252 GOETZ, DBA JERRY GOETZ AND SONS v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 12 Fed. Appx. 718.
No. 01-265 HOECHST CELANESE CORP. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 25 Cal.4th 508, 22 P.3d 324.
No. 01-280 NAPERVILLE READY MIX, INC., ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 744.
No. 01-319 TISBURY TOWING TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., FKA PACKER MARINE, INC. v. TUG VENUS ET AL. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 251 F.3d 298.
No. 01-341 BRICE ET AL. v. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 240 F.3d 1367.
No. 01-351 KNIGHT ET AL. v. BUCKNAM. Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.
No. 01-413 UNITED STATES EX REL. LUJAN v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 1181.
No. 01-459 EATON CORP. v. CITY OF DETROIT. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 247 F.3d 619.
No. 01-468 GARCIA v. ROGER ERNST ASSOCIATES ET AL. Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 01-470 HARNISH v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 F.3d 161.
No. 01-477 BURGESS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Dist.Ct.App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 772 So.2d 540.