From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 1, 2002
535 U.S. 976 (2002)

Opinion

APRIL 1, 2002


No. 01-8176 CHANCE v. PAINTER, WARDEN. Cir. Ct. Preston County, W. Va. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8235 EVANS v. UNITED STATES. (two judgments). C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8274 CARROLL ET AL. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 20 Fed. Appx. 248.

No. 01-8410 BURNS v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 275 F.3d 46.

No. 01-8463 CATLIN v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 26 Cal.4th 81, 26 P.3d 357.

No. 01-8468 VANDERBERG v. DONALDSON. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 259 F.3d 1321.

No. 01-8509 PUENTES-HERRERA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-8510 PIPKINS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 275 F.3d 1078.

No. 01-8512 SMITH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 275 F.3d 1080.

No. 01-8513 RILEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 21 Fed. Appx. 139.

No. 01-8514 SINGLETARY v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 268 F.3d 196.

No. 01-8515 RODRIGUEZ-NUNEZ v. UNITED STATES; and HERNANDEZ-GARCIA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 275 F.3d 1082. (first judgment) and 1083 (second judgment).

No. 01-8516 ARELLANO-RIVERA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 244 F.3d 1119.

No. 01-8521 RUCKER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 21 Fed. Appx. 139.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 1, 2002
535 U.S. 976 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 1, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 976 (2002)

Citing Cases

May v. Myers

00 filing fee at the time he filed this action, plaintiff's action is due to be dismissed without prejudice.…

May v. Hetzel

00 filing fee at the time he filed his Complaint, this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice.…