From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cerreta v. New Jersey Transit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 1998
251 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).


We affirm on the ground that no good faith affidavit was submitted with the motion ( 22 NYCRR 202.7 [a] [2]), and note that the parties' attorneys were in actual telephone communication with each other three days before the scheduled date of the depositions, and that the attorneys affirmations that were submitted in support of the motion contain no indication of good faith efforts in that conversation to set up the depositions. The opportunity then missed only resulted in further court intervention that was not needed.

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Rubin, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Cerreta v. New Jersey Transit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 1998
251 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Cerreta v. New Jersey Transit Corporation

Case Details

Full title:PAUL CERRETA et al., Respondents, v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 858

Citing Cases

Vinar v. Litman

ander E. Sklavos, Esq., Alexander E. Sklavos P.C., Boris Imas and Maria Imas because of their wilful failure…

Sky v. Trustees

Before: Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Buckley and Malone, JJ. Defendant's motion for disclosure sanctions was…