From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cerra v. Maglio

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 27, 1926
134 A. 916 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided October 27th, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J. Eq. 481.

Messrs. Levenson, Comen Levenson, for the respondent.

Mr. Peter Bentley, for the appellants.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Cerra v. Maglio

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 27, 1926
134 A. 916 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Cerra v. Maglio

Case Details

Full title:ALICE CERRA, respondent. v. JOSEPH MAGLIO et al., appellants

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 27, 1926

Citations

134 A. 916 (N.J. 1926)
134 A. 916

Citing Cases

Blumberg v. Weiss

The English doctrine of ancient lights does not obtain in this state. King v. Miller, 8 N.J. Eq. 559; Hayden…

Blumberg v. Weiss

Cases involving the right to light and air usually arise where the owner of two adjoining lots, on one of…