From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cepeda v. 3604-3610 Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 2002
298 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1799

October 8, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered April 1, 2002, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant 3604-3610 Realty Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

ALEXANDER J. WULWICK, for plaintiff-appellant.

JOHN B. SAVILLE, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ellerin, Rubin, JJ.


The motion court properly found that no triable issue of fact existed as to the liability of defendant 3604-3610 Realty Corp., the owner of the subject premises, for plaintiff's slip and fall on the metal stairs leading to the commercial premises leased by defendant Marte. There is no evidence that 3604-3610 Realty Corp., an out-of-possession landlord, consented to be responsible for maintaining the safety of the metal stairs by performing snow and ice removal. The lease pursuant to which the premises were let to defendant Marte did not obligate the landlord to maintain the premises, except structurally, and the deposition testimony indicated that the building superintendent did not clear snow and ice from the metal stairs upon which plaintiff's accident is alleged to have occurred (see Gerber v. City of New York, 280 A.D.2d 289, 290). Nor may liability be imposed upon defendant landlord upon the theory that the stairs in question were affected by a Code violation and consequently defective and hazardous, since the Code section relied upon by plaintiff (Administrative Code of the City of N.Y. § 27-376) is not applicable to the kind of stairs here at issue (see Gaston v. New York City Hous. Auth., 258 A.D.2d 220, 223-224).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Cepeda v. 3604-3610 Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 2002
298 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Cepeda v. 3604-3610 Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CARIDAD CEPEDA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. 3604-3610 REALTY CORP., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 8, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 130

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. E P Assoc.

; Raynor v. 666 Fifth Avenue Limited Partnership, 232 AD2d 226 (1st Dept. 1996). Thus, while a wobbling stair…

Maksuti v. Best Italian Pizza

We reject plaintiff's argument that current Administrative Code § 27-375, entitled "Interior stairs," applies…