From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Central Hanover Bank Trust Co. v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 31, 1935
244 App. Div. 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

May 31, 1935.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Kenneth F. Simpson of counsel [ Francis D. Higson with him on the brief; Jones, Clark Higson, attorneys], for the appellant.

Joseph Lorenz of counsel [ John F.X. Finn with him on the brief; Lorenz Lorenz, attorneys], for the respondent.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., MERRELL, McAVOY, O'MALLEY and UNTERMYER, JJ.


Section 1547 of the Civil Practice Act does not entitle a receiver of rents to five per cent of sums received and disbursed by him as a matter of right, but only to such commissions "not exceeding five per centum" as the court in the exercise of its judgment may allow. Taking into consideration the magnitude of the operation involved here, the fact that the receiver delegated so many of his duties in accordance with the authority contained in the order of appointment and also the disastrous situation of the bondholders, we are of the opinion that a commission of two and one-half per cent instead of five per cent would have been sufficient compensation. However, on various occasions there have been made ad interim allowances to the receiver exceeding this percentage upon notice to all interested parties, and with their express consent or without opposition on their part. For that reason we do not feel justified in requiring the receiver to refund the sums previously allowed, and consider that substantial justice will be done by permitting the receiver to retain these sums and denying his motion for further compensation to May 31, 1934, the date as of which his intermediate account was settled and allowed.

We are further of opinion that the sum of $25,000, as consented to by the plaintiff, is sufficient compensation for the services rendered by the attorneys for the receiver.

The order should be modified by denying the receiver's motion for compensation in addition to compensation previously received and by reducing the total allowance to the receiver's attorneys to the sum of $25,000, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.


Order modified by denying the receiver's motion for compensation in addition to compensation previously received and by reducing the total allowance to the receiver's attorneys to the sum of $25,000, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Central Hanover Bank Trust Co. v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 31, 1935
244 App. Div. 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Central Hanover Bank Trust Co. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:CENTRAL HANOVER BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for the Benefit of the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 31, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
280 N.Y.S. 314

Citing Cases

Dubiner v. Goldman

CPLR 8004 (subd. [a]), referred to by the Special Term as the governing statute for computation of Ruger's…

City of N.Y. v. Big Six Towers

(CPLR 8004; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y. Civ. Prac., par. 8004.02.) In any event, the amount of the…