Opinion
STIPULATION TO VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Under Local Rule 143, the Parties have stipulated to request the Court to vacate the requirements for a joint status report and status conference in the Court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. ECF No. 11. The Parties believe that this case has progressed beyond any need for pretrial scheduling.
On September 4, 2015, this Court ordered counsel to appear for a January 4, 2016, status (pretrial scheduling) conference, and to submit a joint status report fourteen calendar days before then. Id. Since then, the Parties have briefed this case on cross-motions for summary judgment, and the Court has held oral argument on November 30, 2015. Minutes, ECF No. 30. The Parties therefore jointly request the Court vacate the Order to the extent it requires the January 4, 2016, Status Conference and its associated Status Report.
Approving this stipulation will not cause undue prejudice or harm to the Parties' rights or interests because there are no current deadlines in this case, and the Parties do not anticipate a trial. Further, approving this stipulation will serve the public interest by conserving the Court's and the Parties' scarce and valuable resources that they would otherwise spend on the status conference and the joint status report.
Pursuant to the above Stipulation, the Court hereby vacates its September 4, 2015, Order to the extent it ordered the Parties to attend a January 4, 2016, Status Conference, and to the extent it required the Parties to file a joint status report.
IT IS SO ORDERED.