From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centenni v. St. Peter of Alcantara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1984
99 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

January 23, 1984


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated September 10, 1982, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiffs were barred from establishing a prima facie case because of their noncompliance with a conditional order of preclusion. Order affirmed, with costs. In the absence of a motion by plaintiffs to vacate their default in timely serving a bill of particulars in accordance with the conditional order of preclusion, defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Centenni v. St. Peter of Alcantara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1984
99 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Centenni v. St. Peter of Alcantara

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH CENTENNI, JR., et al., Appellants, v. ST. PETER OF ALCANTARA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Turbowitz v. Mapeth, Inc.

It was only in response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment that the plaintiff finally served her…

Tuffo v. Red Coach Realty, Inc.

Plaintiff Peter Tuffo's medical excuse for failure to comply was not verified and, in any event, was legally…