From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cendales v. Sheahan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 26, 2017
146 A.D.3d 1260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

01-26-2017

In the Matter of Latasio CENDALES, Petitioner, v. Michael SHEAHAN, as Warden of Southport Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Latasio Cendales, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Latasio Cendales, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Simmons v. Kirkpatrick, 142 A.D.3d 1245, 1245, 37 N.Y.S.3d 717 [2016] ). As the record discloses that petitioner was assessed a $15 reduced filing fee, he is entitled to a refund of that amount (see Matter of Rodriguez v. Prack, 142 A.D.3d 1235, 1235, 37 N.Y.S.3d 722 [2016] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.

PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY, DEVINE, CLARK and MULVEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cendales v. Sheahan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 26, 2017
146 A.D.3d 1260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Cendales v. Sheahan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Latasio CENDALES, Petitioner, v. Michael SHEAHAN, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 26, 2017

Citations

146 A.D.3d 1260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
44 N.Y.S.3d 922
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 523

Citing Cases

Thousand v. Kirkpatrick

Accordingly, as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be…

Harris v. Prack

In light of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter…