Opinion
21-CV-61035-RAR
06-21-2022
CAYAGO AMERICAS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. RENE HEINEN, et al., Defendants.
ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RODOLFO A. RUIZ II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon United States Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss's Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 193] (“Report”), entered on May 27, 2022. He held a three-day evidentiary hearing on the Motion. [ECF Nos. 99, 100, 102]. At the Hearing, Magistrate Judge Strauss took testimony and reviewed evidence related to this matter. Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report on June 10, 2022 [ECF No. 198] (“Objections”). Magistrate Judge Strauss recommended that the Court DENY the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Report at 1.
When a magistrate judge's “disposition” has been properly objected to, district courts must review the disposition de novo. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Because Plaintiffs timely filed objections to the Report, the Court has conducted a de novo review of Magistrate Judge Strauss's legal and factual findings.
Having carefully reviewed the Motion [ECF No. 45], the Response [ECF No. 63], the Reply [ECF No. 66], Sur-Reply [ECF No. 70], the parties' post-hearing briefs [ECF Nos. 126, 127, 128, 129], the Report, the Objections, the factual record, the applicable law, and being otherwise fully advised, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report [ECF No. 193] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 45] is DENIED.