From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 27, 1944
35 A.2d 896 (N.J. 1944)

Opinion

Argued October 29, 1943 —

Decided January 27, 1944.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 130 N.J.L. 107.

For the respondent, David Roskein.

For the appellant, George E. Meredith.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 27, 1944
35 A.2d 896 (N.J. 1944)
Case details for

Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK CAVANAUGH, RESPONDENT, v. MURPHY VARNISH COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 27, 1944

Citations

35 A.2d 896 (N.J. 1944)
35 A.2d 896

Citing Cases

Ptak v. General Electric Co.

See Garofola v. Yale Towne Mfg. Co., 131 Conn. 572, 41 A.2d 451 (1945); Rivard v. J.F. McElwain Co., 95 N.H.…

Neylon v. Ford Motor Company

We consider that the quoted paragraph was unnecessary to the decision. Nevertheless it became a lever upon…