From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caton v. Doug Urban Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1985
109 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 1, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Genesee County, Mintz, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O'Donnell, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment. This is an action for common-law indemnity by plaintiffs, who had previously paid a default judgment taken against them in an action by a person who had fallen off the roof of plaintiffs' house. As a result of plaintiffs' failure to respond adequately to defendant's interrogatories, plaintiffs were precluded from establishing the reasonableness of the amount of the default judgment, a necessary element of its cause of action ( see, Depo v. Marine Midland Bank, 79 A.D.2d 846, affd 54 N.Y.2d 943; Le Frois Foods Corp. v. Policy Advancing Corp., 59 A.D.2d 1013).


Summaries of

Caton v. Doug Urban Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1985
109 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Caton v. Doug Urban Construction Co.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD CATON et al., Respondents, v. DOUG URBAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)