From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catlin v. Rundell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1896
1 App. Div. 157 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

January Term, 1896.

Owen Cassidy, for the appellant.

Waldo F. Bishop, for the respondent.


The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant in the Justice's Court. It was tried before and submitted to the justice September 14, 1894. The justice rendered judgment against the defendant for the sum of twenty-one dollars and fifty-five cents on the 21st of September, 1894.

The defendant appealed from such judgment to the County Court, which court affirmed the judgment of the Justice's Court, and from such judgment of affirmance by the County Court the defendant appeals to this court.

The judgment rendered by the justice was void, it not having been rendered within four days after the trial and submission of the case to him by the parties. (Code Civ. Proc. § 3015; Putman v. Van Allen, 46 Hun, 492.)

But, although the judgment is void, it is sufficient to support an appeal for the purposes of its review and reversal. ( Gillingham v. Jenkins, 40 Hun, 594, and cases cited.)

The judgment of the County Court and of the Justice's Court should, therefore, be reversed, with costs and disbursements of this appeal and the costs of the appeal to the County Court.

All concurred.

Judgment of the County Court and of the Justice reversed.


Summaries of

Catlin v. Rundell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1896
1 App. Div. 157 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

Catlin v. Rundell

Case Details

Full title:P. HOWARD CATLIN, Respondent, v . JOSEPHINE RUNDELL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1896

Citations

1 App. Div. 157 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
37 N.Y.S. 979

Citing Cases

Smith v. Weitz

Where delay beyond the prescribed period has occurred, it has been uniformly held that the judgment thereby…

Barron v. Feist

Although an inferior court has rendered a judgment without jurisdiction, the appellate court may so far act…