CATE v. PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP, INC.

Full title: Brendon A. Cate, Plaintiff, v. Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc., and…

Court: United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Oct 27, 2006

Civil No. 06-cv-200-SM (D.N.H. Oct. 27, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-cv-200-SM.

October 27, 2006

ORDER

STEVEN McAULIFFE, District Judge

Granted (document no. 10). The motion was made within a reasonable time and sets forth sufficient grounds upon which to conclude that pro se plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of both defendants was due to inadvertence and was unintentional, as evidenced by plaintiff's subsequent inquiry of the clerk as to the status of pleadings in the case. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) and (6). The Amended Notice is allowed; Defendant Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant Aerotek, Inc. remains.

SO ORDERED.