From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Zimmerly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 15, 1999
260 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 15, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.).


Defendant-appellant physicians did not demonstrate on their original motion that Southside Hospital was a public institution maintained in whole or in part by the County of Suffolk, and, accordingly, failed to establish that plaintiff was required to file a notice of claim as a condition of maintaining this malpractice action against the hospital and physicians who practiced there ( see, General Municipal Law § 50-d, [2]; cf., Norr v. Spiegler, 56 A.D.2d 389, affd 44 N.Y.2d 809).

Venue was properly set in Bronx County and defendants-appellants failed to justify their request for the action's removal by establishing that material witnesses would be inconvenienced by a trial held in the Bronx ( see, Cardona v. Aggressive Heating, 180 A.D.2d 572).

The motion to renew was properly denied since it did not present new or additional facts unknown to defendant appellant physicians at the time of their original motion and no valid excuse was presented for the failure to include the "new" matter on the original motion ( see, 300 W. Realty Co. v. City of New York, 99 A.D.2d 708, appeal dismissed 63 N.Y.2d 952).

Concur — Nardelli J. P., Tom, Lerner and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Castillo v. Zimmerly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 15, 1999
260 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Castillo v. Zimmerly

Case Details

Full title:ROSA CASTILLO, Respondent, v. JOHN D. ZIMMERLY et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 148

Citing Cases

Thaw v. Onyebeke

General Municipal Law § 50-d(1) requires a municipal corporation "to assume liability for, and save harmless,…

Pigott v. J.C. Happy Garden Corp.

The denial of reargument is not appealable (seeMcCoy v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 75 A.D.3d 428, 430, 904…