From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Valente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-07165.

June 28, 2011.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Cheryl Valente and Richard Valente, Jr., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated July 1, 2010, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them as untimely.

Baxter Smith Shapiro, P.C., Hicksville, N.Y. (Dennis S. Heffernan and Anne Marie Garcia of counsel), for appellants.

Bragoli Associates, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Susan R. Nudelman and Christopher Bragoli of counsel), for respondent.

Kaplan Belsky Ross Bartell, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Lewis A. Bartell of counsel), for defendant Charles O'Donnell, doing business as Pro-Cission Construction.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Covello, Chambers and Roman, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent.

The note of issue in this action was filed on December 9, 2008. The appellants filed their motion for summary judgment on April 16, 2009, more than 120 days after the filing of the note of issue. Since the appellants failed to show "good cause" for the delay, the Supreme Court properly denied as untimely that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them ( see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648, 652; Riccardi v CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 60 AD3d 838; Finger v Saal, 56 AD3d 606, 606-607).


Summaries of

Castillo v. Valente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 2011
85 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Castillo v. Valente

Case Details

Full title:FREDY CASTILLO, Respondent, v. CHERYL VALENTE et al., Appellants, et al…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5648
926 N.Y.S.2d 304

Citing Cases

Mayorquin v. AP Development, LLC

The plaintiff moved for summary judgment on January 10, 2010, some five months later, without offering any…

Sag Harbor Whaling & Historical Museum v. Wamponamon Lodge No. 437 of Free & Accepted Masons

Although the statutory 120-day period for making a summary judgment motion in this case expired on October…