From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 25, 2023
No. 23895-22L (U.S.T.C. May. 25, 2023)

Opinion

23895-22L

05-25-2023

MARIA M. CASTILLO, DECEASED, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.

On December 23, 2022, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (motion to dismiss) on the grounds that the petition in this case was not filed by the deceased petitioner or by someone legally authorized to represent petitioner's estate. On March 13, 2023, Marcell Rocha, an heir at law of petitioner and the individual who filed the petition on petitioner's behalf, filed a Letter, stating therein that he has no objection to the granting of respondent's motion to dismiss. In addition, no objection has been received from any of petitioner's other heirs at law who were able to be located.

It is well settled that unless the petition is filed by the taxpayer or someone legally authorized to act on the taxpayer's behalf, we are without jurisdiction as to that taxpayer. Fehrs v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 346, 348-349 (1975). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It is further

ORDERED that that, in addition to regular service, the Clerk of the Court shall serve copies of this Order on Marcell Rocha, Patricia Guerra, and Marisol Rocha at their addresses as set forth in respondent's Status Report, filed February 8, 2023.


Summaries of

Castillo v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 25, 2023
No. 23895-22L (U.S.T.C. May. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Castillo v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:MARIA M. CASTILLO, DECEASED, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: May 25, 2023

Citations

No. 23895-22L (U.S.T.C. May. 25, 2023)