Opinion
21 Civ. 1520 (AT)
08-26-2021
ORDER
ANALISA TORRES, District Judge
On April 30, 2021, Defendants Rivera and O'Donnell filed a suggestion of death of Plaintiff on the record, with seivice on Plaintiff s attorney via ECF. ECF No. 12; see also ECF No. 13. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), after a party files a suggestion of death on the record, a paily or the decedent's successor or estate must file a motion to substitute within 90 days of the suggestion of death, or the Com! “must” dismiss the action. Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a)(1); Martin v. NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC, No. 19 Civ. 3789, 2021 WL 1725043, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2021). Here, no motion to substitute has been filed in the over-90 days since the suggestion of death was entered. Moreover, on August 17, 2021, the Com! issued an order directing Plaintiff s estate or successor to show cause in writing by August 24, 2021, why the case should not accordingly be dismissed, and stating that if they failed to do so, the Cotul would dismiss the action. ECF No. 14. No such motion has been filed.
Therefore, this action is DISMISSED under Rule 25(a)(1). See Lopa v. Safeguard Properties Mgmt., LLC, No. 14 Civ. 3193, 2018 WL 3104456, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. May 16, 2018), report and recommendation adopted, No. 14 Civ. 3324, 2018 WL 3019875 (E.D.N.Y. June 18, 2018), and report and recommendation adopted, No. 14 Civ. 3193, 2018 WL 3094940 (E.D.N.Y. June 22, 2018).
The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
SO ORDERED.