From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. 2460 Tiebout Ave. Assoc.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 2022
209 A.D.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

16463-, 16463A Index No. 22502/18E Case Nos. 2021–02039, 2021–02113

10-18-2022

Olga CASTILLO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. 2460 TIEBOUT AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant–Appellant.

Gulko Schwed LLP, Cedarhurst (Asher C. Gulko of counsel), for appellant. Hasapidis Law Offices, South Salem (Annette G. Hasapidis of counsel), for respondent.


Gulko Schwed LLP, Cedarhurst (Asher C. Gulko of counsel), for appellant.

Hasapidis Law Offices, South Salem (Annette G. Hasapidis of counsel), for respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Oing, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered on or about March 16, 2021, which denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 317 and 5015(a)(1), to vacate a default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court (Doris M. Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about May 4, 2021, which sua sponte recalled and vacated an order dated April 23, 2021, and declined to sign defendant's order to show cause to renew and reargue the denial of its motion to vacate the default judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The court properly denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 317 and 5015(a)(1) because defendant failed to present a meritorious defense. The affidavit submitted by defendant was made by a person who failed to even state his relationship to defendant and stated in conclusory fashion that defendant was an out-of-possession landlord who had no notice of the conditions on the property at issue. This does not suffice ( Peacock v. Kalikow, 239 A.D.2d 188, 190, 658 N.Y.S.2d 7 [1st Dept. 1997] ).

Moreover, the court properly concluded that defendant's stated excuse, that it did not receive the summons and complaint because it failed to keep a current address on file with the Secretary of State, does not constitute a reasonable excuse ( John v. Arin Bainbridge Realty Corp., 147 A.D.3d 454, 455, 46 N.Y.S.3d 589 [1st Dept. 2017] ).

Defendant's appeal from the court's sua sponte order entered on or about May 4, 2021, is dismissed, as it is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701[a][2] ; Sholes v. Meagher, 100 N.Y.2d 333, 335, 763 N.Y.S.2d 522, 794 N.E.2d 664 [2003] ).


Summaries of

Castillo v. 2460 Tiebout Ave. Assoc.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 2022
209 A.D.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Castillo v. 2460 Tiebout Ave. Assoc.

Case Details

Full title:Olga Castillo, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 2460 Tiebout Avenue Associates…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

209 A.D.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 5783
175 N.Y.S.3d 210

Citing Cases

Perretta v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

When moving to renew, a party must show it made diligent efforts to obtain the evidence it now relies on,…

Unitrin Safeguard Ins. Co. v. Ciro Della-Noce

The First Department has held that conclusory denial of receipt of a summons and complaint is insufficient to…