From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassese v. Leister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 28, 2002
291 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

346

February 28, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered December 29, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff-appellant's motion to vacate a prior order dismissing the complaint as to him upon his default in opposing a motion to dismiss the complaint as to him on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Stephen P. O'Hare for plaintiff-appellant.

James M. O'Brien for defendants-respondents.

Before: Williams, J.P., Lerner, Buckley, Friedman, Marlow, JJ.


Although appellant testified at deposition that he was unable to work for some five months following the accident and that he had back surgery during that time, he submitted no documentation of either the surgery or the time missed from work. The only medical evidence submitted was an affirmation of a physician who examined plaintiff five years after the 1993 accident, and who had no access to any prior medical reports other than an MRI performed in 1995, which indicated no recurring or new injuries. Plaintiff's deposition testimony, unsupported by a physician's affidavit substantiating his claims of injury or impairment, does not suffice to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he was incapacitated as required by the statute (see, Sigona v. New York City Tr. Auth., 255 A.D.2d 231).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Cassese v. Leister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 28, 2002
291 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Cassese v. Leister

Case Details

Full title:JOANNE M. CASSESE, PLAINTIFF, ADOLPH DELGADO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SEAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 121

Citing Cases

SAHA v. SANANDRES

Regarding the "90/180" category of serious injury, Gouton admitted to missing two days of work and Popy…

HACKETT v. AAA EXPEDITED FRGT. SYS., INC.

The 90 days set forth in the statute are strictly construed ( see e.g. Abrahamson v Premier Car Rental of…