From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassell v. Dawkins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 6, 2010
397 F. App'x 849 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6825.

Submitted: Septomber 28, 2010.

Decided: October 6, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00069-GCM).

Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Charles M. Cassell, III, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cassell v. FNU Dawkins, Dr., No. 5:10-cv-O0069-GCM, 2010 WL 2266972 (W.D.N.C. June 3, 2010). We deny Cassell's motions for copies and to subpoena all evidence and exhibits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Cassell v. Dawkins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 6, 2010
397 F. App'x 849 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Cassell v. Dawkins

Case Details

Full title:Charles M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FNU DAWKINS, Dr.; Guards…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 6, 2010

Citations

397 F. App'x 849 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Mohammed v. Daniels

Plaintiff's disagreement with Owens' decisions with respect to plaintiff's pain management does not rise to a…

McClary v. Lightsey

(Id. Ex. 19). Plaintiff's disagreement with Lightsey's decisions with respect to plaintiff's pain management…