From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caspi v. Weinberg

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 28, 2020
187 A.D.3d 1129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2018–04623 Index No. 518335/16

10-28-2020

Avi CASPI, respondent, v. Gary WEINBERG, et al., appellants.

Auciello Law Group, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac ], of counsel), for appellants. Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, New York, N.Y. (Joshua S. Krakowsky and Larry Hutcher of counsel), for respondent.


Auciello Law Group, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac ], of counsel), for appellants.

Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, New York, N.Y. (Joshua S. Krakowsky and Larry Hutcher of counsel), for respondent.

LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Debra Silber, J.), dated March 12, 2018. The order granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the eighth cause of action, which was to recover damages for breach of contract.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In September 2014, the plaintiff, Avi Caspi, and the defendant Gary Weinberg, both personal injury attorneys and solo practitioners, entered into a fee-sharing agreement to resolve certain disputes between them. In October 2016, the plaintiff commenced this action against Weinberg and the defendant Law Offices of Gary R. Weinberg, P.C., inter alia, to recover damages for breach of the fee-sharing agreement.

We agree with the Supreme Court's determination granting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the eighth cause of action, which was to recover damages for breach of the fee-sharing agreement. The plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to a share of legal fees allocated in the fee-sharing agreement and, in opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Marin v. Constitution Realty, LLC, 28 N.Y.3d 666, 49 N.Y.S.3d 39, 71 N.E.3d 530 ; Wolfe & Yukelson, PLLC v. Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C., 153 A.D.3d 585, 61 N.Y.S.3d 548 ).

AUSTIN, J.P., MALTESE, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Caspi v. Weinberg

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 28, 2020
187 A.D.3d 1129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Caspi v. Weinberg

Case Details

Full title:Avi Caspi, respondent, v. Gary Weinberg, et al., appellants.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2020

Citations

187 A.D.3d 1129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
187 A.D.3d 1129
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 6093