From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caso v. 323 Edgecombe Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1966
25 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Summary

interpreting CPLR 8004

Summary of this case from Goldman v. Bernardini

Opinion

March 15, 1966


Order entered on October 19, 1965, settling the accounts of Samuel S. Goodman, the Receiver herein, overruling the objections of the plaintiffs to the account and directing payment to the receiver of commissions and an additional allowance of $1,250, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting from the order the paragraph awarding to the receiver an allowance for additional services in the sum of $1,250, and otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants. CPLR 8004 (subd. [a]) provides for the maximum compensation to be paid a receiver computed at 5% of sum received and disbursed by the receiver. The statutory commissions represent the maximum amount which may be paid to a receiver for his services. ( Siegel v. Bromanbro Realty Corp., 23 A.D.2d 634.)

Concur — Breitel, J.P., McNally, Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ.


Summaries of

Caso v. 323 Edgecombe Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1966
25 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

interpreting CPLR 8004

Summary of this case from Goldman v. Bernardini
Case details for

Caso v. 323 Edgecombe Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK CASO et al., Appellants, v. 323 EDGECOMBE REALTY CORP., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kane

To allow the receiver to receive a commission higher than that allowed by the statute is contrary to its…

Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.

¶ A receiver is entitled to commissions not exceeding 5% of the sums received and disbursed by him (CPLR…